🩸 The New 'No-Blood Rule': A Stain on Your Record, Not Your Reputation
- Barnaby “Barny” Haybale - TCP
- Oct 28
- 3 min read
Updated: Oct 29
By: An Officially Uninformed Source
LAUSANNE, SWITZERLAND – In a move lauded by the E.L.I.T.E. (Elite Legislative Initiative for Tournament Exemptions) as a victory for "proportionality" and "equine makeup artists," the GEF (Global Equine Federation) is set to vote on a dramatic softening of the legendary "No-Blood Rule."
Previously, any visible blood on a competition horse, whether from a minor nick, a mosquito bite, or an unfortunate encounter with a jump resulted in immediate, soul-crushing and costly elimination. This was, as many riders complained, horribly unfair. Unfair to the rider who had traveled 5,000 km. Unfair to the sponsor whose logo was momentarily obscured by a tiny red dot and who made a start of his rider possible by buying two VIP tables at the event. And most unfairly of all: unfair to the horse, which was suddenly deprived of the chance to finish a demanding course covered in blood stains.
The Dawn of 'Recorded Warnings'
The new proposal introduces a revolutionary concept: The Recorded Warning.
"We are moving from a harsh, unyielding moral absolute to a more nuanced, fiscally responsible, and performance-aligned administrative process," announced a non-existent GEF spokesperson. "Blood is no longer an elimination. It's a Welfare Misalignment Event (WME). You get a Recorded Warning, much like forgetting your jacket number or leaving your helmet strap undone. Only after you’ve collected 12 WMEs in a 12-month period do we ask you to pay a fine equivalent to a good pair of tall boots."
The new hierarchy of Blood Events:
"Self-Inflicted Grazing" (SIG): Your horse bit its own tongue during a triple combination. The Ground Jury will kindly provide a moist wipe and a strong suggestion to the horse "get better at keeping your mouth shut." as well as a well-meant advice to the rider: "The noseband is too lose; tighten it." No Warning. Carry on.
"Tack-Induced Smudge" (TIS): A tiny speck of blood from the spur area, but it's really, really small. The Stewards will debate the definition of 'speck' for 45 minutes, allowing you ample time to complete the jump-off and to win 200 000 Euro of prize money. Recorded Warning.
"Clear and Obvious Laceration" (COLA): Only this leads to elimination. But don't worry, the criteria for COLA are now so stringent, it essentially requires the horse to be visibly leaking essential organs or at least holding a sign that says, "I am not fine."
Why Now? The Public Trust Dividend
The biggest concern, of course, is the public. The non-equestrian public. The people who think horses are majestic creatures and not precision-tuned performance machinery.
We believe the public will appreciate the new emphasis on fairness to the result," explained an anonymous official sipping an artisanal latte. "The truth is, an unfair elimination immediately shifts the narrative away from the athlete's performance and onto the optics, which is where we lose all control. It is deeply regrettable that such unnecessary eliminations due to a bit of blood destroy livelihoods and reputations. When a rider is eliminated for a superficial, almost microscopic injury, it raises uncomfortable questions. By classifying the injury as a bureaucratic formality - a simple Warning - we are signaling that the horse is perfectly fine (a green light for horse welfare instead of a red flag), we are simply engaging in a routine administrative function and show that we do care for horse welfare.
After all, what sends a stronger message of Equine Welfare First?
Option A: "Stop. The horse is bleeding."
Option B: "The horse has incurred a TIS (Tack-Induced Smudge). A warning has been recorded against the Athlete responsible after the competition where he won. The horse is deemed fit to continue thanks to a quick and superficial vet check after the class. Now, can we please focus on the competition and our success?"
The answer is obvious.
The sport is finally prioritizing what truly matters: uninterrupted TV time, no bloody TV pictures and no bloody media scandals.
The Horse’s Perspective
We were unable to reach any of the competing horses for comment, as their rider-appointed press secretaries firmly stated, "They are busy focusing on their performance and are currently unavailable to comment on the internal administrative protocols of the GEF."
However, one retired Grand Prix horse, now enjoying the soft life, whispered, "We are thrilled! Now a little bit of blood is just a badge of honor. It shows you're serious. It’s like a casualty in the pursuit of excellence. Next year, they'll probably start offering bonus points for 'Visible Effort' in consultation with E.L.I.T.E..'
The vote is scheduled for November 5th. Equestrianism is preparing to take a bold, perhaps slightly blood-stained, leap into a glorious future of minimal administrative consequence and unlimited TV rights.
Petitions:
Comments